Charisma
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Claim 1: Fillings of the classes I-V according to Black
Claim 2: Adjustments of shapes and shades
Claim 3: Splinting of teeth which are traumatically loose
Claim 4: Diastema closure
Claim 5: Restorations of primary teeth
Claim 6: Adjustments of developmental teeth defects (e.g. enamel dysplasia)

 
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Claim 1:
Peng Caiyan Guo Weiling. Evaluation of clinical effects of two kinds of composite resin on repairing anterior teeth caries. Chin J Dent Mat Dev 2019; 28: 34.

Yao Mei, Chen Yong, Lu Hongyan. Effects of marginal adaptation with different materials on restoring dental wedge ? shaped defects. Chin J Prim Med Pharm 2019; 26: 202.

Ding Yuansheng, Zhang Hongwei, Feng Yao. Clinical analysis and comparison of three kinds of materials for restoration of tooth wedge-shaped defects. Heilong Jiang Med 2013; 5: F0003.

Chen Ping. Clinical observation of deep dental wedge-shaped defects with three diferent methods. Int J Stoma 2012; 39: 153.

He Aimin. Clinical research into senile cementum caries by using 3 kinds of filling materials. J Dent Mat Dev 2003; 12: 75.

Gu Hongzheng, Feng Ying.Three-year curative effect observation on repairing wedge-shaped defects with three different materials. J Jiangsu Univ 2010; 20: 451.

Duan Xifeng, Duan Kun. Analysis of the curative effect of different materials in repairing tooth wedge-shaped defects. Mod J Int Chin West Med 2010; 19: 3275.

Zhou Zheng, Deng Zhuofeng. The effect of different materials in repairing wedge-shaped defects And its influencing factors . Shangdong Med 2016; 56: 89.

Claims 2 - 6:
Claim 1:
JI Qui-xia, Zhong De-yu,XU Quan-chen. A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THREE MATERIALS FOR RESTORATION OF DENTAL W EDGE-SHAPED DEFECTS. Acta Aad Med Quingdao Univ 2005; 41: 332.

Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Am J Dent. 2001 Oct;14(5):304-8.

XU Min~,ZOU Xiao-xian. Aesthetics restroration of tooth cervix defect with 3M Light-Cured compounded resin. cHIN j aESTHET mED 2006; 15: 435.        

Xu Guigang, Xu Guiling, Sun Liwei.Self-curing Charisma PPF composite resin and glass ionomer Comparison of the effect of cement in repairing wedge-shaped defects.Chin J Cons Dent 2001; 11: 171.

LIU Li- jing, ZHANG Lei, BAI Yu-hong. The clinical curative effect observation of repairing wedge-shaped defect with 3 kinds composite resin. Chin J Front Med 2014; 4: 124.

Qiu Xu. Observation on the clinical effect of root caries filling treatment in the elderly. Chin J Mod Drug Appl 2010; 4: 86.

Zhang Wei. Clinical comparison of different materials for filling tooth wedge-shaped defects. Chin Pract Med 2009; 4: 49.

He Jing. Comparison of the curative effect of two methods in repairing wedge-shaped defect teeth .Guangxi Med J 2006; 28: 535.

Wang Yan, Peng Huaguang. Clinical observation of three kinds of materials in repairing tooth wedge-shaped defects. Inner Mongol Med J 2006; 7: 595.

Tan Zhongrong, Xu Wenhui. Light-curing resin reinforced glass ionomer repair Clinical observation of wedge-shaped defect.J Xianning Univ 2009; 1: 55.

Claim 5:
Wang Yan, Liu Yao, Feng Peixun, Zhang Zhixia.The effect of Fuji IX glass ionomer cement in filling deciduous molar caries. Chin J Aesthet Med 2011; 10: 1619.

Claims 2 - 4 and 6:
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0