Concise

Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

Claim 1: recommended for use in Class III restorations
Claim 2: recommended for use in Class V restorations
Claim 3: for limited use in Class I restorations in premolars
Claim 4: for limited use in selected Class IV restorations where esthetics are of primary importance

.

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

Gomez SS, Basili CP, Emilson CG. A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents. Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):239-43.

Chen Xx, Liu Xg. Clinical comparison of Fuji VII and a resin sealant in children at high and low risk of caries. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):512-8.

Raadal M, Utkilen AB, Nilsen OL. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996 Dec;6(4):235-9.

Winkler MM, Deschepper EJ, Dean JA, Moore BK, Cochran MA, Ewoldsen N. Using a resin-modified glass ionomer as an occlusal sealant: a one-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Oct;127(10):1508-14.

Ganesh M, Tandon S. Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006 Fall;31(1):52-7.

Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. A clinical comparison of a light cured glass ionomer sealant restoration with a composite sealant restoration. J Dent. 1996 Nov;24(6):399-405.

Gandini M, Vertuan V, Davis JM. A comparative study between visible-light-activated and autopolymerizing sealants in relation to retention. ASDC J Dent Child. 1991 Jul-Aug;58(4):297-9.

Warren DP, Infante NB, Rice HC, Turner SD, Chan JT. Effect of topical fluoride on retention of pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Hyg. 2001 Winter;75(1):21-4. Erratum in: J Dent Hyg. 2003 Summer;77(3):157.

van Dijken JW. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Aug;64(2):148-52.

Baca P, Bravo M, Baca AP, Jiménez A, González-Rodríguez MP. Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007 Oct 1;12(6):E459-63.

Smales RJ. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1991 Nov-Dec;16(6):202-9.

Qin M, Liu H. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):580-7.

XU Yan,WU Qing-ju,LUO Li-ping,JIN Shi—qing. Evaluation of the clinical efect of fluoride coating com bined with pit and fissure sealing or preventive resin filling on prevention of first permanent molars caries. Shanghai J Stoma 2018; 27: 298.

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 1 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0