Dyract
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet
IFU Link
Claim 1:
Direct restorations of all cavity classes in posterior teeth
Claim 2:
Direct restorations of all cavity classes in anterior teeth
.
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
Claim 1:
Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J. 2000 Jul 22;189(2):93-7.
Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J. 2002 Sep 28;193(6):339-42.
Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res. 1999 Sep-Oct;33(5):387-92.
LU Ye. Evaluation of clinical effects of the restoring deciduous molar teeth caries with different materials. Chin J Cons Dent 2005; 15: 515.
Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Apr;112(2):188-96.
WANG Zhi-gang,Jl Ya-li. The analysis of curative effect of primary molars by 3 dental materials. Henan Med Res 2004; 2: 164.
Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Aug;128(8):1088-96.
Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000 Jan-Feb;67(1):37-41, 8-9.
Daou MH, Attin T, Göhring TN. Clinical success of compomer and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Follow up in 36 months. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2009;119(11):1082-8.
Claim 2:
Liu Qicheng, Niu Weidong. Dyract and light-curing composite resin instantly repair crown folds. Clinical Observation of Pulp-exposed Young Permanent Anterior Teeth. J Dal Med Univ 2006; 28: 42.
ZHAO Meng-ming. Clinical evaluation of restoring incisal corner defect of crown fracture. J Tianjin Med Univ 2001; 7: 249.
ZHAO Mengming.ZHAO Yan.Restoring incisal corner defect with Dyragt complex. Mod J Stoma 2000; 4: 254.
Claim 1:
Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Am J Dent. 2002 Aug;15(4):274-8.
Trachtenberg F, Maserejian NN, Soncini JA, Hayes C, Tavares M. Does fluoride in compomers prevent future caries in children? J Dent Res. 2009 Mar;88(3):276-9.
Claim 2:
van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22.
Shantanu Choudhari, P. Sudha,Vidyasagar Mopagar, Basavaprabhu. Clinical evaluation of efficacy of three restorative materials in primary teeth- Six month follow up study. IJCDS 2010; 1: 45.
Ji QIU-xia,ZHONG De-yu,XU Quan-chen. A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THREE MATERIALS FOR RESTORATION OF DENTAL W EDGE-SHAPED DEFECTS. Acta Acad Med Quingdao Univ 2005; 41: 332.
van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent. 1996 Oct;9(5):195-8.
Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent. 1997 Feb;10(1):18-20.
Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):153-6.
FANG Yongmei. Clinical Effects of Three Materials for Restoration of Dental Wedge-shaped Defects. Appl J Gen Pract 2006; 4: 292.
LIANG Gui--xiang. Comparison among three methods in the restoration of teeth with wedge-shaped defects. Chin J Cons Dent 2004; 14: 450.
SU Dong-hua?WANG Cheng-long. The analysis of curative efect among three kinds of materials in the restoration of senile persons witll root caries.Chin J Geriatr Dent 2007; 5: 143.
Chen Hui Wang Hong-guang. Comparative analysis of restoration of wedge-shpaed deffects by three different dental materials in elderly patients. Chin J Med Guide 2014; 16: 397.
Kou Yansong. Dyract complex for repairing spiky defects. Clinical curative effect observation of Dyract complex in restoration of cuneiform defect. Chin J Med Write 2001; 8: 49.
Yin Facheng Gu Qiong Shi Wei Li Wei Wei Jinxiu Li Donghua.A clinical comparative study of three kinds of materials for restoration of tooth wedge-shaped defects. Chin J Mod Drug Appl 2011; 5: 25.
CHEN Qian-qian
．
ZHANG Feng
，
CHENG Qi-ting. Light
-
cured dental composite wedge-shaped defect in the clinical research. Chin Pract Med 2011; 6: 27.
LI Ping, ZHANG Qing, WANG Jiade, et al. Evaluation clinical longterm curative effect and analysis of its influence factors after restoration of teeth with wedge-shaped defects. Chin J Stoma 2001; 36: 437.
van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 1997 Dec;1(4):185-90.
Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 1998 Jun;2(2):58-66.
Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Montanari G. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 1998 Dec;2(4):168-73.
Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Mar;5(1):31-9.
Oberländer H, Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Kopp A. Clinical performance of polyacid-modified resin restorations using "softstart-polymerization". Clin Oral Investig. 1999 Jun;3(2):55-61.
Li Zhuo. Comparison of the effects of three restoration methods in the treatment of tooth wedge-shaped defects. Contemp Med Symp 2019; 17: 71.
Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater. 1998 Jul;14(4):294-306.
van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):915-22.
WEN Ping. An Evaluation of Clinical Effect of Materials Used for Restoring Dental Wedge-shaped Defect. Guangdong Dent Dis Prev Contr 2003; 3: 180.
SHI Yan-lei. Evauation Clinical Curative Effect of Three Approaches to Restoration of Teeth with Wedge- shaped Defects. Guide Chin Med 2011; 9: 208.
CHI Xue- qian,et al. Clinical comparative study of restoring wedge-shaped defect with Dyract compo mer and composite resin. Hebei med 2003; 9: 673.
Wang Shiwei, Wang Shipeng. Comparison of the effects of three methods in repairing wedge-shaped defects. Hei Long Jiang Med Pharm 2005; 28: 85.
LI Yan-e, HUANG Fang, PAN Zhi - hong, HONG Yun. Clinical Results of Dyract and Light - curing Composite for Restoration of Dental Wedge- shaped Defects. Int Med Health Harald 2006; 6: 28.
ZHANG Lin,XU Zhi-ming,CHE Ming-qi.Clinical Research of 3 Methods to Restore the Wedge-shaped Defect. J Aero Med 2011; 22: 406.
Ye Ping. Evaluation of wedge-shaped defects repaired by Dyract compomer. J Dent Mat Dev 2000; 1: 33.
Zhang Lifang. Observation of clinical curative efects on repairing wedge-shaped defects by three kinds of filling materials. J Dent Mat Dev 2002; 11: 212.
He Aimin. Clinical research into senile cementum caries by using 3 kinds of filling materials. J dent mat Dev 2003; 12: 75.
Zhu Yonghe, Wang Jiongming, Ye Wenyang, Li Zhengwei. Clinical analysis of mending wedge-shaped defects with three diferent kinds of materials. J Dent Mat Dev 2008; 17: 159
.
Zhao Ying. Three ways to repair wedge-shaped teeth Observation of damage effect. J Henan Med Cill Staff Work 2004; 16: 373.
Deng Li. Clinical observation of different materials for repairing root caries of the elderly. J Jining Med Coll 2008; 31: 218.
QIU Zi-li. Comparison of Three Different Materials for Wedge-shaped Defects. J Nanchang Univ 2011; 51: 49.
Wang Ping Kang Pengcheng. Observation on the curative effect of three methods to repair wedge-shaped defect. J Oral Sci Res 2009; 25: 526.
Mei Lingxuan. Observation on the effect of 3 kinds of materials in repairing wedge-shaped defects. J Pract Stoma 1998; 14: 102.
WU Qun, ZHU YiMin, Zhang Yan,Gao Ming.Study on clinical curative effects of root caries in elder patients.J Pract Stoma 2009; 25: 895.
Li Xueying. Repair of wedge shape with glass ionomer cement combined with light-curing composite resin Analysis of Defect Efficacy. J Qiqihar Univ Med 2011; 32: 1625.
GE Jun, ZHANG Ling. A clinical comparative study of two materials used for restoring wedge-shaped defect. J Xinjiang Med Univ 2005; 28: 958
.
LI Hui-liang.YANG Ling-yun.Two Kinds of Repair Methods for Teeth Depth of the Wedge-shaped Defect. Med Phil 2011; 32: 27.
Cao Guijun. Repair of glass ionomer cement and Dyract complex Comparison of Wedge-shaped Defects in the Neck of Teeth. Mod J Int Chin West Med 2003; 12: 1600.
Huang Hui,Sun Futing. Restoring Wedge-shaped Defect with Dyract Complex Filling Material. Mod J Stoma 1997; 4: 274.
Lu Xiaoling, Li Ping, Wang Jiade, Zhang Qing, Zhang Haihua, Wang Jun. Evaluation of the quality and lifespan of the restorations with two materials for wedge-shaped defects. Pract Clin Chin West Med Clin J 2007; 7: 9.
Wen Yang Juan. Clinical comparison of two filling materials in repairing wedge-shaped defects. Prim Med Forum 2014; 18: 2954.
Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results. Quintessence Int. 1997 Apr;28(4):255-8.
de Luca-Fraga LR, Pimenta LA. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Quintessence Int. 2001 Jun;32(6):463-8.
Peng Xiang, Gao Yun, Li Wei. Analysis of curative effect of two kinds of materials in restoration of tooth wedge-shaped defect. Sci Tech Baotou Steel Corp 2001; 27S: 174.
Zhou Zheng, Deng Zhuofeng. The effect of different materials in repairing wedge-shaped defects And its influencing factors. Shangdong Med 2016; 56: 89.
Lin Xihong. The comparlsion of clinical effects between Dyract complex and glass Ionomer cement(GIC)treatment of wedge—shaped defect. Shanghai J Stoma 1999; 8: 82.
CHENG Pei—hong.HE Gen—rong. Observation of the clinical efects of two kinds of resin materials for restoring the defects of maxillary incisor. Shanghai J Stoma 2014; 13: 353.
