Claim 5:
Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Mar;5(1):31-9.

Claims 1 - 4, 6 - 12:
Tetric
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Claim 1: Class I restorations
Claim 2: Class II restorations
Claim 3: Class III restorations
Claim 4: Class IV restorations
Claim 5: Class V restorations
Claim 6: Restoration of deciduous teeth
Claim 7: Extended fissure sealing
Claim 8: Direct veneering
Claim 9: Splinting of mobile teeth
Claim 10: Blocking out of undercuts
Claim 11: Repair of composite/ceramic veneers
Claim 12: Inlays/onlays with extraoral post-tempering

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Am J Dent. 2001 Oct;14(5):304-8.

van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):915-22.

Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Sep;84(3):289-96.