Tytin
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet
IFU Link
Claim 1:
dental restorative material in the treatment for dental caries
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine. Caries Res. 1997;31(5):384-9.
Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Groen HJ, van Amerongen WE. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Res. 1999;33(2):130-4.
Ettinger RL. Evaluating the longevity of restorative materials that seal the root canals of overdenture abutments. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Oct;126(10):1420-5.
Mahler DB, Engle JH. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jan;131(1):43-9.
Kreulen CM, Tobi H, Gruythuysen RJ, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ. Replacement risk of amalgam treatment modalities: 15-year results. J Dent. 1998 Nov;26(8):627-32.
Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities. ASDC J Dent Child. 2002 Jan-Apr;69(1):16-26, 11.
Cannon ML. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Jan-Apr;70(1):65-70.
Staninec M, Artiga N, Gansky SA, Marshall GW, Eakle S. Bonded amalgam sealants and adhesive resin sealants: five-year clinical results. Quintessence Int. 2004 May;35(5):351-7.
Claim 1:
Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Analyses of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991 Feb;49(1):47-63.
Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res. 1999 Sep-Oct;33(5):387-92.
Osborne JW, Norman RD. 13-year clinical assessment of 10 amalgam alloys. Dent Mater. 1990 Jul;6(3):189-94.
Neo J, Chew CL, Osborne JW, Mahler DB. Clinical evaluation and microstructural analysis of a direct placement gallium restorative alloy. J Dent. 2000 Feb;28(2):123-9.
Smales RJ. Longevity of low- and high-copper amalgams analyzed by preparation class, tooth site, patient age, and operator. Oper Dent. 1991 Sep-Oct;16(5):162-8.
Osborne JW, Norman RD, Gale EN. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Quintessence Int. 1991 Nov;22(11):857-64.
Claim 1:
Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Oct;130(10):1459-66.
Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HB, Borgmeijer PJ, Gruythuysen RJ. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations. ASDC J Dent Child. 1993 Jul-Oct;60(4-5):310-4.
